“Exclusive” Is Dead

Did you hear? You’ll only be able to play Street Fighter V on Playstation 4. It’s an exclusive!

Well, Street Fighter V will also be on PC, but only those! It’s an exclusive!

That’s how the world at large breached news of a new Capcom fighter, spreading it far and wide. It’s dumb and it’s happening way too much now. Exclusives might not be dead, but the term’s use certainly is.

console exclusive

Street Fighter isn’t an exclusive, it’s multiplatform. When games come out on more than one platform, they lose their “exclusive” status and instead move from that to multiple platforms. It’s that simple, really, but in the new climate of game marketing, the term is being washed away by eager press releases and media is all too happy to pass along the hype.

More than it being wrong, since exclusivity to a grouping will always technically be accurate, stretching the term makes it meaningless. If everything is exclusive, then nothing is. That’s why the term has always stuck to one product. When previous generations fought over dominance, they did so through exclusives. Playstation 3 had games, like Demon’s Souls or Metal Gear Solid 4, which couldn’t be played anywhere else. Xbox 360 had Crackdown and Forza. PC and Nintendo have always been cool with providing their own line of titles.

if everything is exclusive then nothing is

Now, game releases and the industry as a whole have become focused entirely on mimicry and the direct competition between PS4 and Xbox One in particular. Xbox One costs €499? Well, the PS4 will be €399 then! PS4 attracts indies? Well, Microsoft will buy Minecraft’s Mojang, the biggest “indie” of them all! It’s more than a little childish, but probably also not a healthy mentality to keep pursuing, at least not as a long-term plan. There’s only so much waiting for the other side to make a move that one can do, before both sides lay in waiting forever. If you want some personal speculation, I also believe that’s one reason why Vita has been sent to the slaughter, despite promises of long-term support, because Sony is so fixated on countering the Xbox One at all turns. There are no eyes left for other things. That’s a story for another time though.

But again, more than just a meaning that changes, as the evolution of language often totally literally goes, it can be confusing to use the term whenever. This has already presented media and consumers with questions when the latest Tomb Raider was announced as an Xbox exclusive. Microsoft’s Phil Spencer didn’t even feel like specifying if that meant the game would never release elsewhere, though they had a part in confusing people. That’s a rather hostile stance. Here, the goal is to trap consumers. Cryptic information helps, but locking the view to a tiny pinhole is even better. Buyers need to be pushed towards sticking to a certain platform. Whether that motivation is drawn by desire or fear of missing out isn’t that important, as long as they do it. In Tomb Raider’s case, it already wasn’t completely exact, as the game will release for both Xbox One and Xbox 360. It sounds better if it’s an exclusive though, even if the only two options of a multiple release is within the same company. That’s how sad marketing is.

Tomb Raider xbox exclusive

PC and Nintendo are no longer a part of the regurgitated commercial babble, because the other two consoles are running scared. PS4 and Xbox One need to push those others aside to keep their dominance going, since exclusives don’t really happen that often anymore. Actually, if anything, the PC and Nintendo are fine with their range of exclusives. They don’t need to push an agenda, since they’re just providing a space that has neat things that can’t be experienced elsewhere. If exclusives are still around for Sony and Microsoft, they’re not as present as previous generations. One reason for it is that blockbuster game development has become so inflated that it’s just not economically sound to limit platforms. Millions of units need to be shifted now, before a Tomb Raider can even be called successful anymore. Ninja Theory, who has been working on large games for a few years now, stated that your standard spectacle chart-topper requires a $100 million budget, for a video game.

So, since that world of single-platform titles is growing smaller, companies are much harder on pushing from within that, with exclusive content. Quantity looks as big as ever, because the scope has been shrunken down to size. FIFA has a Legends option that’s restricted to Xbox. Publisher Ubisoft has been assisting Sony with content “only on Playstation.”  Assassin’s Creed has a mission that can be played here. Far Cry has a gun that can only be used there. This mentality eventually leads to Watch Dogs getting so many specific exclusives that it needed a chart to decipher all of it. It’s all smoke and mirrors, kids. It’s getting you to choose option A, because it has two or three more diminutive bullet points than option B.


In this panopticon of content, it’s impossible to know what content is or isn’t in a game everyone gets anyway. You’re going to play the game and never really be aware of what part you played that your neighbor didn’t, unless you’re actively looking to one-up someone. Bridges would burn if one console received an integral part of the game, while the other one didn’t. It’s all fluff, so its unique nature is almost always insignificant. All sides will still get the same game, which isn’t very restricted at all.

We need to be able to move on from that. So, here’s an idea: Whenever a media outlet copies the hype speech from some marketing firm, point it out that the game isn’t exclusive. State the inconsistency with putting up a title that alludes to a restricted product, while it’s available on multiple platforms. Let’s take it back. Let’s get excited again that when a game says it’s an exclusive, it really is totally unavailable on anything else. “Console exclusive” isn’t a thing; it’s just putting blinds on the rest of the gaming space. It’s dumb.

Words have meaning or they used to, at least. We don’t need all of our info to be laced with marketing. We don’t need our capitalistic products to be solely capitalistic. It’s perfectly possible to make up one’s own mind without any tricks. Sure, it’s possible to do so with tricks as well, but that’s really a crappy attitude to uphold.

Whatever; I’m going to play one of the actual hundreds of PC exclusives. Maybe I’ll turn on the 3DS before bed.

exclusive 2

Did you hear Dungeon Defenders II is going to be exclusive on PS4?



7 thoughts on ““Exclusive” Is Dead

  1. I have heard this argument before about if a game is also released on PC it is not “exclusive.” However I never really saw it as having significant grounds for legitimacy. To understand all we really need to do is to look at the definition of the word; “excluding or not admitting other things.” So by the very definition, if Titanfall is not being released on the PS4, it has become exclusive. And as for marketing purposes, I am unsure if you are aware of this, but the overwhelming majority of money from triple A titles comes from console sales, they essentially sustain the budgets of games like Grand Theft Auto PC sales make up just a tiny fraction, so for all intensive purposes, to the average joe playing big tipple A titles, the fact that a game will be unavailable is quite significant.

  2. The Last of Us, Sunset Overdrive, Master chief Collection, Infamous, Red Dead redemption, Mario, gears of War these are all required to sustain the Triple a console industry.

  3. I don’t really game on PC anymore because pretty much every game these days is designed for consoles then later on released on PC with a ton of problems. There are a few exceptions, but for most of the types of games I am interested in, its overwhelming the case.

  4. I bought a PS4 this year after it took more than a year for Metal Gear Rising to come to PC, pretty much done with the whole the whole Orgin, U-Play thing/

  5. Exclusive – I don’t think that word means what you think it means. You can be exclusive to 1 item or a few items, but the term is still accurate and therefore valid. Realize this is the fault of the English language and blame the Brits or their ancestors for bringing this wonderful language to the rest of mankind. As a related example: when a video game is an exclusive to PS3 and PS4 they are talking about exclusive to Sony. While the whole exclusive video game thing has become more irritating over time don’t be mad at the word be mad at the people who make it exclusive in the first place with there gobs of money.

  6. There are multiple platforms on the market, more than two. Street Fighter V will only be available on two of them, so therefore it is exclusive to those two and not available on the rest.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s